We need to become good citizens in the global village, instead of competing. What are we competing for - to drive more cars, eat more steaks? That will destroy the world. - Yuan T. Lee



JUDICIARY







Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) is in talks to acquire the 60% stake it does not already own in Chinese food ordering and delivery platform Ele.meaccording to the FT. The deal could value Ele.me at upwards of $9.5 billion, while sellers would include Baidu, Horizon Ventures and Sequoia Capital China.

  • Why it's the BFD: Because this would provide Alibaba with its first in-house delivery workers and logistics network, things that global rival Amazon already has and is learning from.
  • Bottom line: "Should the deal go through, Alibaba would become one of the country’s largest players in food delivery, rivaled only by online-to-offline services platform Meituan Dianping, which is backed by Alibaba’s competitor, Tencent." — Emily Feng, FT  [Axios, Pro Rata, February 27, 2018]



HOUSE INTELLIGENCE












DHS




DOD











MEN AT WORK: House Natural Resources Chairman Rob Bishop took a bipartisan congressional delegation to Australia and New Zealand for energy and defense-related activities, a committee aide told Anthony on Friday. The lawmakers were there to look at energy activities in Australia and examine New Zealand's deregulation of its energy sector and learn about "the strategic importance of the two nations as a counterbalance to less-friendly powers in the Pacific," the aide said. [POLITICO's Morning Energy, February 26, 2018]




Inside the White House trade fights
Bloomberg scooped on Friday that Trump wants the Commerce Department to 
seek the harshest maximum tariffs on global steel imports: 24 percent.  
I’m told that’s accurate, but with one small tweak: Sources tell me the president 
has told confidants he actually wants a *25* percent global tariff on steel because
it's a round number and sounds better.
The big picture: Also, an official with knowledge of the trade discussions told me
the White House is preparing to impose tariffs on a "shit ton" — meaning, 
potentially hundreds — of Chinese products. They'll avoid going through the 
World Trade Organization — which Trump doesn't trust — and instead use 
Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to unilaterally retaliate against China for 
stealing Americans’ intellectual property.
  • Timing: Two sources told me Trump has been impatient and wanted these 
301 tariffs done yesterday, but the team still hasn't settled on which Chinese products to attack. The
team hasn't presented its recommendations to Trump.
  • The free traders — think Steven Mnuchin, Gary Cohn, Kevin Hassett, and 
Everett Eissenstat — only want tariffs on Chinese products that many other countries also produce
(including uranium, consumer electronics and LED light bulbs.) They're trying to blunt any impact on
 American consumers.
  • However, a former top government trade official told me: "This is how trade 
wars start. There is zero chance China does not retaliate against us in painful ways..."
What's next: The much bigger fight inside the Trump administration concerns 
whether they'll put massive tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, as Wilbur 
Ross' Commerce Department "found that the quantities and circumstances of 
steel and aluminum imports 'threaten to impair the national security'." That was
part of what’s called a Section 232 investigation.
  • Sources with knowledge of the discussions tell me James Mattis, Gary Cohn,
 Rex Tillerson, and Kevin Hassett all think Wilbur Ross did a terrible job on Commerce’s 232
investigation and strongly disagree with his recommendations. (This is the continuation of an
ideological battle that's played out throughout the Trump administration between the free-traders
and the protectionists.)
  • One official told me Ross' report doesn’t properly account for the negative 
impact of these tariffs on downstream jobs — for example, auto suppliers and other U.S. businesses
that import steel and aluminum to make their products.
  • Mattis' Defense Department pushed back officially against Ross' 
recommendations: "DoD continues to be concerned about negative impact on our key allies
regarding the recommended options within the reports."
  • The same report conceded that "imports of foreign steel and aluminum 
based on unfair trading practices impair the national security." But the phrase "unfair trading
practices" — and Mattis' subsequent singling out of China — is a clear indication that the Defense
Department doesn't support broad tariffs.
The pushback: When I shared these harsh criticisms with the White House and 
agencies, only Rex Tillerson's team would go on the record to deny our 
reporting:
  • From Tillerson's team, a State Department official said: "Secretary Tillerson 
has not expressed this sentiment and wouldn’t speak negatively about another cabinet member."
  • From the White House, Raj Shah said: "We are not responding to rumors 
and will not get ahead of the President. The process is ongoing, the President is reviewing the report
and nothing is confirmed until he’s made a decision... The President’s team at the White House is
leading a process that will ensure the President has all the information necessary for him to make a
decision in the best interests of the American people."
  • From the Pentagon, spokesman Adrian Rankine-Galloway emailed: "The 
Department of Defense provides its best military advice to the President. Ultimately, it is the
President who decides how his policies will be implemented."
Finally, a Commerce Department official pushed backed against the assertion 
that Ross didn't properly analyze the impact on the overall economy.
"DOC modeling has not shown any substantial impact on the overall economy 
as a result of the proposed steel tariffs," the official said. "This is consistent with 
the finding of the International Trade Commission that the Section 201 (in 2002) had negligible effects on the overall economy...While these were different products than those covered in the 232, they are all steel, and the ITC 
is an empirical source." [Axios Sneak Peek, February 25, 2018]


U.S., AUSTRALIA AGREE ON DIGITAL TRADE PUSH: Thirteen months after Trump withdrew from the TPP, the U.S. and Australia have agreed to "intensify cooperation" on a groundbreaking part of the pact - digital trade. Lighthizer and Australian Minister for Trade, Tourism and Investment Steven Ciobo met Friday and issued a statement pledging to "support the growth of digital trade between our countries, ensure an open, free and secure internet, and advocate the liberalization and facilitation of global digital trade."  The two trade officials, in another promise reminiscent of TPP, said they would seek to ensure "workers and small and medium-sized enterprises can succeed in the digital economy." Australia and the remaining 11 TPP members are scheduled to sign a revised deal without the U.S. in two weeks' time

Building off Buenos Aires: Lighthizer and Ciobo said they seek to build on the momentum from the 11th WTO Ministerial Conference in December, where 70 WTO members accounting for more than 75 percent of global trade - Australia and the U.S. included - agreed to work toward future negotiations on e-commerce.  "This initiative provides an opportunity to create ambitious, commercially meaningful international trade rules that address key trade barriers and will keep pace with technological change," the duo said in the statement. . [POLITICO's Morning Trade, February 26, 2018]



INFRASTRUCTURE






CANDIDATES







READ







GLOBAL

Bloomberg assembles team to take health taxes global: Are soda taxes fizzling or picking up steam? Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers have teamed up to create a task force that will recommend to countries ways to use mechanisms like excise taxes on sugary drinks and tobacco to improve public health. [POLITICOS Morning Agriculture, January 19, 2018]



WHIMSEY





Want an adventure? Employees of a fur company owned by John Jacob Astor set off 207 years ago today [Sept. 8] from New York for the Pacific Northwest - and arrived in Astoria, Ore., six months later, following a trip around the tip of South America on a ship called the Tonquin. POLITICO




MEXICO




CANADA




GREAT BRITAIN




SWEDEN




RUSSIA







CHINA







AUSTRALIA






NOTE: The news sources here vary.  Not all sources have the same credibility, but in an effort to share some different perspectives, they are included here.  This compendium itself cannot claim to be unbiased.  Please take into consideration where these different perspectives originate in assessing their value.  Thank you

NOTE: I have no official connection to any organization from which information is shared.. Occasionally, I post informational material and/or an opportunity to donate or join as  a "community service" announcement.  These again are shared for their varying perspectives.

Any books listed are random or topic-related to something else in the post.  Think of these as a "library bookshelf" to browse.  They are shared for informational or entertainment value only, not as being recommended

Comments