“Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of production and trade...” ― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged
House Republicans stress trade
priorities in meeting with Trump: House Ways and Means Republican
leaders said that they would work with Trump to renegotiate NAFTA and get tough
with China over its trade practices - as long as he stays within certain
limits, [POLITICO's Morning Agriculture, February 28, 2018]
REPUBLICANS WARN TRUMP ON TARIFFS: As
President Donald Trump mulls whether to slap tariffs on all steel and aluminum
imports and take other action aimed specifically at China, Republicans are
stepping forward to warn those moves could backfire on the United States if the
White House is not careful.
"As the administration considers remedies under Sections
232 and 301, we must keep in mind that tariffs aren't paid by foreigners,"
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch said in a speech at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. "Tariffs are taxes
paid by American businesses and American families, and new tariffs would
jeopardize some of the opportunities we successfully created through tax
reform."
In a similar vein, House Ways and Means Chairman Kevin
Brady said after a White House meeting between Trump and more than
two dozen House Republicans that he was "committed to working with the
president on narrow and targeted remedies that address China's distortions
without hurting other U.S. industries and workers."
A third Republican, Rep. Jackie Walorski, said she raised
concerns in the meeting with Trump. "On the topic of potential aluminum
and steel tariffs, I reiterated the importance of a careful and balanced
solution that does not raise costs for American manufacturers or put jobs at
risk," Walorski said. [POLITICO's Morning
Trade, February 28, 2018]
U.S. AGRICULTURE |
U.S. poultry sales to China still blocked after
duties removed: While China has decided to remove anti-dumping
and countervailing duties on U.S. broilers, the outlook for U.S. poultry and
egg exports remains dim, the USA Poultry and Export Council said Tuesday.
Beijing made the move to lift duties to comply with a World Trade Organization
ruling - but the Chinese market remains closed to U.S. exporters because of a
ban that was imposed in 2015 after an outbreak of avian influenza in the United
States. [POLITICO's Morning Agriculture, February 28,
2018]
A majority of
Americans are now concerned that the government won't do enough to
regulate how U.S. technology companies operate, according to an Axios/SurveyMonkey poll:
- Across
the board, concern about government inaction is up
significantly — 15 points — in the past three months, Axios' Kim Hart writes.
- 45%
of Republicans, who are usually
skeptical about government regulation, share the concern that government
won't do enough.
- Independents
showed the biggest shift, with an increase of 20
points.
- More
than eight in 10 — including big
majorities across party lines — blame the technology companies for not
doing more to safeguard their platforms against election interference.
- Why
it matters: That's a seismic shift in the public's
perception of Silicon Valley over a short period of time.
- It
shows how worried Americans are about Russian meddling in
the 2016 election, and reflects a growing anxiety about fake news and the
potentially addictive nature of some of the tech companies' products.
P.S. Former
President Obama said last week at a sports
analytics conference at MIT that companies like Google and Facebook need to
have a conversation about their business model and "recognize that they
are a public good as well as a commercial enterprise," Axios' Sara Fischer reports.
- Obama: "[W]e have to have serious conversation about what are the
business models, the algorithms, (and) the mechanics whereby we can create
more of a common conversation and that cannot just be a commercially
driven conversation." [Axios AM, February 28, 2018]
PEAK DEFAZIO: A hearing on aviation
safety ended on a tense note Tuesday when Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) took aim at
Shuster's FAA bill. "The only problem with the current system is the
idiots I work with," DeFazio said. "I don't like the way this place
is working right now. And I think there's some groups supporting this
privatization who really in their hearts don't support it."
Safety first: Earlier during the hearing,
Ali Bahrami, FAA associate administrator for aviation safety, told members of
the Aviation Subcommittee that he thinks Shuster's bill wouldn't create
"any adverse impact to safety." "And I base that on the fact
that there are 60 or so countries that have already done that," Bahrami
said. "And the level of safety, based on various studies ... it stayed the
same or has improved."
Regulatory or deregulatory? Lawmakers also
asked the hearing's witnesses, which included officials from NTSB, the DOT
inspector general's office and the Air Line Pilots Association, about drone
safety and regulations. Rep. Dina Titus (D-Nev.) said she had sent a letter to OMB Director Mick Mulvaney about President Donald
Trump's 2-for-1 executive order with concerns about its potential effects on
the drone industry. Mulvaney replied earlier this month, saying
OMB thinks that "a rulemaking expanding the uses of [drones] may qualify
as deregulatory." To the administration, "deregulatory actions"
are "rules that expand consumption and/or production options," which
"generate cost savings."
Eagle-eyed Davis: The Eno Center for
Transportation's Jeff Davis noted: "Per [Tuesday's] @DOTInspectorGen testimony before @Transport Committee, since Aug. 2016 the #FAA
has received 15,000 requests for waivers of the drone/UAS rules. 10% approved,
40% denied, 43% still being processed." [POLITICO's
Morning Transportation, February 28, 2018]
DEM AGs CONFIDENT ON COURT FIGHTS AGAINST
TRUMP: Several Democrat attorneys general said on
Tuesday they are optimistic that their early wins in court against many initial Trump administration efforts to
roll back environmental regulations will translate to victories down the road
as well. "I don't think they've demonstrated they have the desire or
capacity to handle this situation," said Becerra at a meeting of the
National Association of Attorneys General. He acknowledged the administration
could learn from losses in ultimately repealing rules, but said that "at
the end of the day ... I still think we have the upper hand."
Massachusetts AG Maura Healey said she wished the Trump administration had
"more respect for the rule of law." She added: "It's still an
administration whose playbook seems to be bought and paid for by the fossil fuel
industry and oil and gas. I don't think Administrator Pruitt has changed one
bit from who he was as AG Pruitt." [POLITICO's Morning Energy, February
28, 2018]
NO FINAL DEFENSE ALLOCATION YET, House
Defense Appropriations Chairwoman Kay Granger said [Tuesday] her panel does not
yet have a final topline to craft full-year defense spending legislation. "In
a brief interview with POLITICO, the Texas Republican said the defense
subcommittee allocation - the funding to be parceled out to the Pentagon in a
final omnibus spending bill - is 'not solid enough to say.'"
And the Pentagon requests $21.2 billion for
its fiscal 2019 military intelligence budget. [POLITICO's
Morning Defense, February 28, 2018]
FORMER PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA |
IMMIGRATION |
ROYALTY BATTLE ROYALE: Energy
producers should keep an eye on Interior's Royalty Policy Committee, which is
meeting in Houston today to consider recommendations for lower royalties and
streamlined regulations. The goal is to spur additional fossil fuel and
renewable energy projects on federal lands and offshore in order to boost the
amount of revenue the government collects from those activities. Today's
meeting is the full committee's second since Secretary Ryan Zinke reinstated it
last March. It will consider recommendations drawn up by several
subcommittees over the last year.
Limiting deep-water offshore drilling royalties to 12.5
percent is one of several recommendations the committee will consider
from the subcommittee for planning, analysis and competitiveness. The
subcommittee also recommended a variety of steps to streamline permitting and
environmental requirements and speed energy development. In Alaska, it
recommended Interior schedule lease sales in the Arctic National Wildlife
Refuge "as soon as practicable and ahead of the statutorily required
timeline." Kathleen Sgamma, president of the industry group Western Energy
Alliance and a member of the subcommittee, told The Washington Post, "This
is the time to get federal lands back competitive with nonfederal lands."
Democrats say Interior is being too friendly to industry. "This proposal would amount to a giveaway to some of the most profitable companies in the world and rob taxpayers of potentially billions of dollars of revenues over the life of the leases," Sen. Maria Cantwell and Rep. Raúl Grijalva wrote of the proposal to reduce offshore drilling revenues from their current rate of 18.75 percent. Critics also said the committee had too many representatives of the fossil fuel industry and not enough from public interest groups. "Zinke has stacked the deck with energy companies and asked them if they should pay less to extract oil, gas, and coal from our public lands and waters," Center for Western Priorities Executive Director Jennifer Rokala said in a statement. "It's like asking kindergartners if they want birthday cake for dinner. You know the answer you'll get." [POLITICO's Morning Energy, February 28, 2018]
Democrats say Interior is being too friendly to industry. "This proposal would amount to a giveaway to some of the most profitable companies in the world and rob taxpayers of potentially billions of dollars of revenues over the life of the leases," Sen. Maria Cantwell and Rep. Raúl Grijalva wrote of the proposal to reduce offshore drilling revenues from their current rate of 18.75 percent. Critics also said the committee had too many representatives of the fossil fuel industry and not enough from public interest groups. "Zinke has stacked the deck with energy companies and asked them if they should pay less to extract oil, gas, and coal from our public lands and waters," Center for Western Priorities Executive Director Jennifer Rokala said in a statement. "It's like asking kindergartners if they want birthday cake for dinner. You know the answer you'll get." [POLITICO's Morning Energy, February 28, 2018]
ED WATCHDOG DEMANDS NEARLY $100K FROM PUERTO RICO: A
damning audit into Puerto Rico's adult education program during 2012 and 2013
found issues with the record-keeping of performance data and contract awards -
and compels the island's education agency to return almost $100,000 in
questionably allocated funds.
- The audit was conducted by the Education
Department's Office of the Inspector General, which found that the
island's education agency could not provide documentation proving that eight of
the 29 contracts reviewed by in the audit were properly awarded. Those
contracts amount to payments of nearly $76,000, which the department is asking
Puerto Rico to return. The audit also found issues with payments made to
contractors, and is asking the agency to return roughly $21,000 in payments
that weren't properly documented.
- "Without sufficient supporting documentation, Puerto
Rico cannot provide assurance that it used all Adult Education program funds in
accordance with applicable laws and regulations," the audit reads. The
watchdog also found that Puerto Rico's Education Department failed to report
complete performance data from two of the island's seven educational regions,
and did not properly audit organizations that received grants from the agency.
- Puerto Rican officials largely disagreed with
the audit's findings before they were published, according to the audit report.
Education Secretary Julia Keleher has until the end of March to formally
respond to the report. Read it here. [POLITICO's Morning Education, February 28, 2018]
NIKKI HALEY
United States Ambassador to the
United Nations
|
ROBERT MUELLER,
SPECIAL COUNSEL
|
YOU DECIDE |
SLOVAKIA |
RUSSIA |
ITALY |
EUROPE |
CHINA |
NOTE: The news sources here vary. Not all sources have the same credibility, but in an effort to share some different perspectives, they are included here. This compendium itself cannot claim to be unbiased. Please take into consideration where these different perspectives originate in assessing their value. Thank you
NOTE: I have no official connection to any organization from which information is shared.. Occasionally, I post informational material and/or an opportunity to donate or join as a "community service" announcement. These again are shared for their varying perspectives.
Any books listed are random or topic-related to something else in the post. Think of these as a "library bookshelf" to browse. They are shared for informational or entertainment value only, not as being recommended
Comments
Post a Comment