Haphazard, incompetent




DAILY SPECIALS




Biden posts video promising to change behavior after allegations of unwanted touching



Trump Punts on Obamacare Replacement Until After 2020 Elections

In a flurry of tweets Monday night, President Trump continued to criticize the Affordable Care Act but indicated that any new vote on a Republican plan to replace the law would wait until after the 2020 elections, essentially punting on a hot-button political issue he had resurrected just last week to the consternation of many Republicans.
The Trump administration argued in a court filing last week that the entire Obama health care law should be ruled unconstitutional. Trump followed up on that filing by declaring that the GOP would soon be known as “the party of health care,” but his fellow Republicans were surprised by Trump’s push and generally wary of reengaging in a fight that helped Democrats retake control of the House in the 2018 elections. And the ensuing scramble made clear that the party still doesn’t have an Obamacare alternative that it can coalesce behind, even as Trump announced that GOP lawmakers would “come up with something really spectacular.”
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) told reporters on Tuesday that he spoke with the president Monday and made clear that the Senate will not be taking up comprehensive health care legislation before the 2020 election. Trump’s tweets came after that conversation.
White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders said Tuesday that the president "wants to work with Congress to come up with the right health care plan." She added that Trump is focused on protecting patients with preexisting medical conditions, making care more affordable and giving patients a say in the care that they receive.
Why it matters: Trump appears to have accepted GOP calls that he hold off on a new Obamacare replacement effort and instead focus his reelection strategy on attacking Democratic Medicare-for-all proposals. That likely makes political sense, for now, especially since Republicans don’t have a plan — and even if they did have one, it wouldn’t have a chance of passing a divided Congress. It’s much easier to attack the Democratic plans, promise Americans will get “great health care” and leave the thorny details aside.
Trump’s decision ensures that health care will be front and center in the 2020 elections, though it alleviates some of the immediate pressure on Republicans to produce a plan. In the meantime, though, the Trump administration continues to support a lawsuit that could result in the Affordable Care Act being struck down — and 20 million Americans losing coverage — without providing an alternative. “In short,” writes Bloomberg columnist Max Nisen, “the GOP is gambling with the stability of the U.S. health-care system because its best health policy ideas can’t pass on their own merits.”
The bottom line: The problem for Trump, New York magazine’s left-leaning columnist Jonathan Chait says, is that “the Republican party is structurally and endemically incapable of devising a health-care program that is remotely acceptable to the public. The reason, which has been amply demonstrated over the last decade, is that most people think ‘great’ health insurance gives everybody access to medical care. But paying for that care requires some combination of taxes and regulations on insurance, both of which violate conservative dogma.” [The Fiscal Times, April 2, 2019]


JARED KUSHNER






“I think political questions of some kind really could have been discussed”

By 2016, the U.S. presidential campaign was in full swing, but the relationship between the Agalarovs and the Trump conglomerate was not yet over. When Araz Agalarov asked his son to arrange a meeting with someone within the Trump team, Emin did not see anything strange in the request. He delegated the task to Rob Goldstone, and Russian attorney Natalya Veselnitskaya ultimately met with Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and his campaign manager Paul Manafort in Trump Tower. Agalarov said that when he asked Goldstone about the meeting after the fact, his former manager told him, “This is the most ridiculous meeting I have ever attended.”
Ridiculous or not, Agalarov said, he soon forgot about the meeting. If it would have seemed important, he claimed, he would have handled it himself rather than delegating its organization to Goldstone. Now, he says that Goldstone said Veselnitskaya had offered the Trump campaign dirt on Hillary Clinton and her team just to hook Trump’s aides into unrelated political discussions. “I think political questions of some kind really could have been discussed during that meeting. That lady, the lawyer, she had plans that weren’t just about the Magnitsky list, as I understand it.” When news of the meeting blew up in the American media, the Russian singer said, he stopped discussing his communications with the Trump team with anyone, including his father, on the advice of their attorneys. [The Real Russia. Today. March 29, 2019]


MIKE PENCE
       U.S. Vice President         







WAR ON DRUGS






VETERANS






Brain connectivity may determine PTSD patients’ response to behavioral therapy

Psychotherapy is the standard treatment for PTSD, but distinct patterns of brain connectivity may explain why it’s not effective for some patients. In a new study, researchers compared verbal memory skills and brain scans of 153 healthy controls with 204 patients with PTSD — 128 of whom were combat veterans. In the PTSD group, some had difficulty with the memory test, some had scans revealing poor connectivity in an area of the brain that regulates attention to stimuli, and others displayed both characteristics. Those with only one of the symptoms were more responsive to psychotherapy than patients who showed both memory problems and abnormal brain connectivity. However, the authors write that more work is needed to identify the relationship between the two symptoms. [STAT: Morning Rounds, April 4, 2019]



TRUMP







IMMIGRATION







READ









FRANCE








MONGOLIA







SWITZERLAND







SAUDI ARABIA









NOTE: I have no official connection to any organization from which information is shared.. Occasionally, I post informational material and/or an opportunity to donate or join as  a "community service" announcement.  These again are shared for their varying perspectives.


Any commercial or business interest information shared is purely informational, not an endorsement.  I have no connection with any such commercial or business interest.

Any books listed are random or topic-related to something else in the post.  Think of these as a "library bookshelf" to browse.  They are shared for informational or entertainment value only, not as being recommended.

Comments