Sartre defines bad faith as our refusal to admit, either to others or ourselves, the meaning of our actions, even (or especially) as we carry them out. For example, while I might commit a succession of wildly partisan acts, I fail to see what strikes others as a meaningful pattern. This blindness results from my reflex to see each of these acts individually, and my ability to invoke mitigating factors for each of them. And so, I can tell myself, and others, that I am the most objective of actors, someone fully capable of exhibiting the proper temperament when necessary. - Robert Zaretsky











Groups sue HHS for Brett Kavanaugh-related documents. Lambda Legal and American Oversight are seeking to compel HHS to produce documents ahead of Kavanaugh's confirmation vote for the Supreme Court.

They're particularly focused on Kavanaugh's work on LGBTQ-related issues: He served as staff secretary to President George W. Bush when the administration was pursuing a ban on same-sex marriage, for instance, and the groups allege Kavanaugh was the in-house expert on faith-based initiatives. "The public deserves to know exactly how Kavanaugh handled LGBTQ civil rights issues during his time in the White House," said American Oversight's Austin Evers. See the lawsuit [POLITICO Pulse, September 14, 2018]


ARCHETYPES FOR POLARIZED TIMES

Christine Blasey Ford, a middle class, female university professor from California, could almost personify the Democratic Party and its resistance to Trump.

She showed in her testimony Thursday that she’s no political conspirator; indeed, her evident innocence of the wiles of politics gave her words much of their credibility. But the simple facts of who she is made her a potent symbol.

The same holds true for Kavanaugh, although with a twist.

As the Yale-educated son of an influential Washington lobbyist, he’s certainly far removed in social class and upbringing from the rural, evangelical Protestant, non-college-educated voters who make up so much of Trump’s political base. But as a longtime Republican operative, he instinctively knew how to tap the same well of grievance against liberal elites that has cemented those voters to Trump.

The allegations against Kavanaugh mounted during the week. That may not have helped his opponents. The 
third allegation, in particular, brought by a computer security contractor named Julie Swetnick, gave Republicans an opportunity to take shots at her attorney, Michael Avenatti, and portray all the accusations as political.

Still, as David Savage wrote, some of the biggest problems Kavanaugh faced stemmed from his own words and the 
conflicting accounts he has given of his teenage drinking.

Among the other figures who have been bruised by the Kavanaugh fight — Sen. Dianne Feinstein. As Sarah Wire wrote, the senior Democrat on the Judiciary Committee 
has gotten intense criticism from Republicans over how she handled the accusations against the nominee.

We still don't know if the 
wrenching and emotional testimony on Thursday actually changed a single Senate vote. Sen. Jeff Flake of Arizona, who had insisted he wanted a hearing where Ford could speak, announced Friday that he would give Kavanaugh the benefit of the doubt.

As Jennifer Haberkorn, Wire and Savage wrote, when the final roll call comes early next week, the deciding votes, and as has often been the case, appear to be in the hands of Sens. Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska.

But any forecast of the vote has to begin with the reality that the 51 Republican senators who make up the majority represent a constituency that’s much whiter, more conservative and more rural than the nation as a whole.

Because each state has an equal vote in the Senate, the chamber has always had a counter-majoritarian aspect. That’s more true now than it was a generation ago when Thomas won confirmation, and likely will be even truer after this year’s midterm elections.

Against that background, Ford’s accusation of sexual assault and Kavanaugh’s angry denial and counter-accusation of a left-wing plot to destroy his good name could not have been better designed to 
widen the gulf separating the two sides of a polarized nation.


TRUMP SETS A TONE

The anger in Kavanaugh’s voice as he denounced the allegations against him pleased the man who nominated him, aides said.

Trump had thought Kavanaugh didn’t show enough fight earlier in the week when he sat for an interview with Fox. And he publicly blamed Senate Republicans for not ramming the nomination through to a vote more quickly, before the accusations against Kavanaugh could take root.

On Tuesday, he 
denounced the allegations as part of a “con game,” as Wire and Eli Stokols wrote.

Then on the eve of the hearing, he amplified his complaints, saying for the first time publicly that 
his view of the allegations against Kavanaugh was colored by his own experience of having been accused of sexual misconduct.

If Kavanaugh wins confirmation, Trump will surely claim credit for having rescued the situation.

If he loses, the president will blame Senate leaders and implore voters in red states to send him more loyal backers. That prospect continues to worry some Democratic strategists, who have tried to protect incumbents running for reelection in places like West Virginia, Indiana and North Dakota — the three states whose Democratic senators have yet to announce how they will vote. [LA TIMES, Essential Politics, September 28, 2018]




















DAY TWO OF FALLOUT from CBS's firing of longtime "60 Minutes" executive producer Jeff Fager began with Jericka Duncan - the CBS reporter who received the bullying text messages from Fager that prompted his ouster - appearing on the network's morning show. Duncan said she interpreted Fager's texts as a threat, adding, "This is someone who held an enormous amount of power here, who I respected and I was shocked."
- Fager, of course, left amid allegations (which he has denied) that he inappropriately touched female employees and condoned a culture of sexual harassment at "60 Minutes". At the Washington Post, columnist Margaret Sullivan ticked through Les Moonves, Charlie Rose, Mark Halperin, Bill O'Reilly and Roger Ailes, asking how the country would be different "if power-happy and misogynistic men hadn't been running the show in so many influential media organizations - certainly not just CBS."
- Sullivan wrote, "A media figure doesn't have to show up for a business meeting in an open bathrobe to do harm ... He can help frame the coverage of a candidate's supposedly disqualifying flaws. He can squelch a writer's promising work. He can threaten an underling's job if she doesn't stay in line and remember who really runs the show around here." [Morning Media, September 14, 2018]


BEZOS TAKES ON TRUMP: Amazon CEO and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos criticized Trump's rhetoric on media last night in an interview hosted by the Economic Club of Washington, POLITICO's Steven Overly reports. "It's really dangerous to demonize the media," Bezos said. "It's dangerous to call the media lowlifes. It's dangerous to say they're the 'enemy of the people.'" The Post owner also said, "It is a mistake for any elected official in my opinion ... to attack media and journalists. I believe that it's an essential component of our democracy. [Morning Media, September 14, 2018]



MARIJUANA







READ







MIDDLE EAST







INDONESIA






Indonesia
 
The death toll keeps rising in Palu as desperation grows for survivors of last week's earthquake and tsunami. At least 1,234 have been killed, and crews keep finding bodies in the rubble. Residents in Palu faced a fifth day without adequate food and clean drinking water. Motorists lined up for hours just to get a bit of gas. International help is on the way, with the Red Cross sending seven tons of logistical supplies, and Australia giving an initial $500,000 in aid. Here's how you can help.     [Good Morning from CNN, October 2, 2018]



KRGYZSTAN












North Korea: U.S. ‘Smear Campaign’ Undercuts Trump Agreement
The rocky relationship between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un has hit another low. North Korea has accused the U.S. on Friday of making up “preposterous falsehoods” after Washington charged an alleged hacker for the North Korean government over a series of cyberattacks. The statement, signed by a researcher at a foreign ministry institute, said the charges could undermine the agreements reached between Trump and Kim Jong Un that were signed earlier this year. “The U.S. is totally mistaken if it seeks to gain anything from us through preposterous falsehoods and highhandedness,” wrote Han Yong Song. “The U.S. should seriously ponder over the negative consequences of circulating falsehoods and inciting antagonism against the DPRK that may affect the implementation of the joint statement adopted at the DPRK-U.S. summit.” The statement went on to call Park Jin Hyok, accused of hacking on behalf of the North Korean military, a “nonentity” and called the charges “vicious slander and another smear campaign.” [The Daily Beast: AM Cheat Sheet, September 14, 2018]



MALAYSIA







CHILE






COLOMBIA







EL SALVADOR







CUBA







ST KITTS







HAITI







NOTE: I have no official connection to any organization from which information is shared.. Occasionally, I post informational material and/or an opportunity to donate or join as  a "community service" announcement.  These again are shared for their varying perspectives.


Any commercial or business interest information shared is purely informational, not an endorsement.  I have no connection with any such commercial or business interest.

Any books listed are random or topic-related to something else in the post.  Think of these as a "library bookshelf" to browse.  They are shared for informational or entertainment value only, not as being recommended.

Comments