People are dying because of our national healthcare policies
DAILY SPECIALS |
JOHN
F. KELLY
Chief
of Staff
|
W.H. STAFF 'HAS NO CONFIDENCE' IN KELLY TALKING
TO MEDIA: POLITICO's Annie Karni reports on frustration over chief of staff John Kelly's recent interview with NPR, in which he said undocumented immigrants "don't have
the skills" to assimilate in the U.S. and suggested it's not cruel to
separate parents from their young children. "The staff has no confidence
that he can handle any media," one former White House aide told Karni.
"They can't figure out how to get him to do any interview without screwing
up." [Morning Media, May 14, 2018]
READ |
SCREEN |
POLITICS |
MARIJUANA |
JUDICIAL MATTERS |
DISCOVERY IN ENTREPRENEUR RULE CASE: The
plaintiffs in a lawsuit over the Obama-era international entrepreneur rule
filed a discovery motion Wednesday to find out whether the Trump administration
complied with a court order to proceed with its implementation.
The administration moved in July 2017 to delay
the start date of the rule, which allows certain startup founders to remain in
the U.S. for up to five years on "parole." But a federal judge in
D.C. ordered that the rule take effect as scheduled, since the administration
had not followed proper rulemaking procedures. USCIS Director Francis Cissna
said in an early April letter that no parole requests had been approved under the
program, which some have dubbed a "startup visa." Later that month,
Bloomberg reported that only 10 people had applied for parole through the
program. The administration is expected to soon issue a rule to roll it back.
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit to
preserve the program haven't given up. The National Venture Capital Association
said in it discovery motion that it has "grave concerns" about
whether the administration has ignored the court's order to allow the program
to move forward. The industry group contends it has filed three parole
applications through the program, but the applications haven't been
adjudicated. Read the motion here. [POLITICO's Morning
Shift, May 11, 2018]
ISIS |
Shoot-out at high noon in eastern Syria. Someone
with artillery tried to attack the U.S.-backed Syrian Democratic Forces near
the eastern city of Dayr Az Zawr at noon Thursday, CENTCOM said in a statement.
As a result, and with little detail, the "SDF responded in self-defense,
resulting in the destruction of one artillery piece."
FWIW: CENTCOM said it carried out one airstrike Thursday near Dayr Az-Zawr, and credited the destroyed artillery piece in that strike to Daesh, or ISIS.
ISIS is still making car bombs. And two days before, near the border with Iraq, two airstrikes are said to have destroyed five different car bomb factories near the cities of Abu Kamal and Al Shadaddi.
For the record: ISIS is down to its last two percent of territory it once held in Iraq and Syria, Stars and Stripes reported from the USS Harry Truman — which is "pounding" ISIS in Syria from the carrier's position in the Mediterranean Sea. [The D Brief, May 11, 2018]
FWIW: CENTCOM said it carried out one airstrike Thursday near Dayr Az-Zawr, and credited the destroyed artillery piece in that strike to Daesh, or ISIS.
ISIS is still making car bombs. And two days before, near the border with Iraq, two airstrikes are said to have destroyed five different car bomb factories near the cities of Abu Kamal and Al Shadaddi.
For the record: ISIS is down to its last two percent of territory it once held in Iraq and Syria, Stars and Stripes reported from the USS Harry Truman — which is "pounding" ISIS in Syria from the carrier's position in the Mediterranean Sea. [The D Brief, May 11, 2018]
In early
2017, veteran venture capital firm CRV decided to raise a dedicated growth
equity fund that would be led by General Atlantic vet Brett Rochkind. In short,
the bi-coastal firm believed its dedicated to early-stage investing had cost it
opportunities, both in terms of follow-on investments for existing portfolio
companies and later-stage rounds for select companies where it had passed on
the Series A (e.g., Ring).
- The plan, as we
reported, was to raise up to $400 million for the growth
equity fund and another $400 million for CRV's 17th flagship fund. The
first page of its investor pitch-deck said: "One team, two
funds."
- CRV got over $700 million in total commitments, including $400
million for the early-stage flagship.
- But the firm changed its mind before calling any capital for either
fund. CRV instead worked with LPs to close on $600 million for a single
vehicle that includes an allocation of up to $150 million for growth
equity.
- The extra $130 million was effectively given back, which means some
investors were pared back and others were knocked out altogether. (some of
you might recall that CRV was among several VC firms that returned lots of
uncalled capital during the dotcom bust, deciding it had raised more than
they could reasonably invest.)
- Rochkind will step down as a CRV partner, but will remain a senior
advisor.
What happened: My
understanding is that this was mostly an issue of cultural fit. For example,
Rochkind wanted a private equity-type staffing model (i.e., junior analysts)
that was anathema to CRV's mentorship-driven process for venture associates.
Sources insist that there is no personal animus between CRV and Rochkind, just
that the two sides realized that "one team, two funds" was easier
said than done.
CRV
statement to Axios: "CRV
is one of first firms in country to raise a 17th fund and we are incredibly
honored by the support from the two audiences that matter most: Entrepreneurs
and LPs. The new fund allows us to execute on our continued early-stage focus
but with an additional mandate to invest in very selective growth opportunities
we believe can drive venture returns." [Axios Pro Rata: Friday, May 11]
• Jeneration
Capital Management of Hong Kong is raising $800 million
for a new growth equity fund focused on consumer tech investments, per Bloomberg. http://axios.link/6Gaa [Axios Pro Rata:
Friday, May 11]
IMMIGRATION |
WAPO's MIKE DEBONIS: "Ryan aims to quash GOP-led
rebellion trying to force votes on immigration": "Ryan
(R-Wis.) told reporters he would 'like to' take up an immigration bill, one day
after 17 Republicans signed a petition that would force votes on a number of
immigration bills. A discharge petition is a rarely successful legislative
maneuver that overrides the speaker's power to determine what legislation comes
to the House floor.
"'Going down a path and having some kind of a spectacle
on the floor that just results in a veto doesn't solve
the problem,' Ryan said, suggesting that President Trump would reject the bills
that the petition would discharge. 'We actually would like to solve this problem,
and that is why I think it's important for us to come up with a solution that
the president can support.'" https://wapo.st/2jP32aP
-- IF YOU'RE A HOUSE REPUBLICAN or
Democrat, for that matter, who wants immigration reform, leadership's cajoling
probably sounds pretty hollow, as they've been saying they want to get an
immigration bill done for a while and have made no progress whatsoever. [POLITICO Playbook, May 11, 2018]
ICE, DEPORTATION & EXPULSION |
ICE top official Thomas Homan — a vocal
advocate for Trump's immigration crackdown — intends to depart next month.
[POLITICO's Morning Shift, May 11, 2018]
Vitiello for ICE?: The administration official tells Morning Shift that
the White House has considered acting CBP Deputy Commissioner Ron Vitiello to
replace Homan as the top ICE official. Vitiello became Border Patrol chief in February
2017 and was tapped for the acting CBP deputy role that April. The idea of a
Border Patrol official at ICE might seem a bit odd, but it isn't without
precedent. During the Obama administration, Thomas Winkowski made a similar
move from CBP to
ICE in 2014. [POLITICO's Morning Shift, May 11, 2018]
START YOUR ENGINES: Competing voices will
be on full display today when Trump meets with automakers that will plead their
case on fuel efficiency standards. The goal for the manufacturers: Beat back
the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's strict plan and persuade
the White House to reach a compromise with California. Top executives from
Ford, General Motors and Toyota, as well as the Alliance of Automobile
Manufacturers and the Global Automakers, will warn that NHTSA's plan would lead
to a market split, creating uncertainty across the country.
Wait, what's going on? DOT, which found itself
in the backseat during the Obama administration, has switched roles with EPA
under Trump. The department has been driving the internal debate over what to
do about the Obama-era rules carmakers have said are too onerous for them to
meet, Pro Energy's Eric Wolff reports. The most aggressive options — and the
one automakers are trying to avoid — would freeze fuel efficiency standards at
2020 levels and revoke California's authority to set its own greenhouse gas
limits on tailpipe emissions. If that were to move forward, the administration
would find itself in a legal battle with California and a host of states, which
have prevailed in court in the past. [POLITICO's Morning Transportation, May 11. 2018]
HHS |
HHS IS DIVIDED OVER NATIVE AMERICAN
WORK REQUIREMENTS, PUNTS IT TO THE STATES — The
Office of General Counsel, which decided that the tribes shouldn't get an
exemption from Medicaid work requirements because it would constitute an
illegal racial preference, hasn't budged on that decision.
However, the lawyers' perspective isn't shared
by the agency's leaders, POLITICO's Dan Diamond and Rachana Pradhan scooped
last night. CMS Administrator Seema Verma — who has championed Medicaid work
requirements and has granted them in four states — is "fine" with
giving the tribes an exemption, according to three people who have spoken with
her.
... While Verma and other leaders have told the
tribes that they should work with states to get exemptions, that hasn't
resolved the contentious question at the center of the dispute: Are the tribes
sovereign governments, as detailed in the Constitution and upheld by the
Supreme Court, or are they racial groups as HHS lawyers have argued? [POLITICO Pulse, May 11, 2018]
CYBERSECURITY |
PRO-ENCRYPTION BILL LAUDED — Privacy and
civil liberty groups hailed a bipartisan group of House lawmakers for
resurrecting legislation that would prevent tech companies from building
"backdoors" into their devices. As first reported Thursday in MC, the
members introduced a tweaked version of the Secure Data Act , which would prevent courts from issuing orders to break
encryptions. The new measure "will help ensure that in a time of
heightened threats to national and digital security, users and businesses are
able to rely on strong encryption without the risk of imposed
vulnerabilities," Ed Black, the president and CEO of the Computer and
Communications Industry Association, said in a statement.
The bipartisan bill "could not come at
a better time," according to Robyn Greene, the policy counsel and
government affairs lead for the Open Technology Institute at the think tank New
America. "Despite reports that tools giving law enforcement access to the
contents of encrypted devices are increasingly available and affordable, the
FBI and DOJ are unrelenting in their attacks on strong encryption." [POLITICO's Morning Cybersecurity, May 11, 2018]
NOTE: The news sources here vary. Not all sources have the same credibility, but in an effort to share some different perspectives, they are included here. This compendium itself cannot claim to be unbiased. Please take into consideration where these different perspectives originate in assessing their value. Thank you
NOTE: I have no official connection to any organization from which information is shared.. Occasionally, I post informational material and/or an opportunity to donate or join as a "community service" announcement. These again are shared for their varying perspectives.
Any commercial or business interest information shared is purely informational, not an endorsement. I have no connection with any such commercial or business interest.
Any books listed are random or topic-related to something else in the post. Think of these as a "library bookshelf" to browse. They are shared for informational or entertainment value only, not as being recommended.
Comments
Post a Comment